Israel Lobbyist Suggests False Flag Attack to Start War with Iran

Every once in a while, they come right out and say it, plain as day!  Here we see Patrick Clawson, the Director of Research of the Washington Institute, the Israeli lobby group, mentioning Pearl Harbor, the sinking of the Lusitania, Gulf of Tonkin, The USS Maine, Fort Sumter, etc.  (probably too early to mention 9/11) as good examples of manufacturing consent to justify war...

Top-Secret Document Reveals NSA Spied On Porn Habits As Part Of Plan To Discredit 'Radicalizers'

According to an article published in the Huffington Post yesterday, "The National Security Agency has been gathering records of online sexual activity and evidence of visits to pornographic websites as part of a proposed plan to harm the reputations of those whom the agency believes are radicalizing others through incendiary speeches, according to a top-secret NSA document. The document, provided by NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden, identifies six targets, all Muslims, as “exemplars” of how “personal vulnerabilities” can be learned through electronic surveillance, and then exploited to undermine a target's credibility, reputation and authority."

Read the whole article here:  http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/11/26/nsa-porn-muslims_n_4346128.html?1385526024


The solution: Be PROUD of what you masturbate to. Make sure it's quality stuff....something with people being tastefully fucked - like an Obama press conference or something.

Emotional Marketing to Sell Fast Tex-Mex

They WILL Find You

According to York Press, "Inside six lucky packs, there will be a GPS enabled bar which, when the winner pulls the tab, notifies the prize team who will leap into action locating the winner within 24 hours." A Nestle spokesman added that "inside their wrappers, the GPS-enabled bars looked just like normal chocolate bars."

In a very creepy marketing campaign, Nestle plans to stalk UK consumers. The company kicked off a promotion called "We will find you" that involves GPS trackers embedded in chocolate bars. When a winning consumer opens the wrapper, it activates and notifies the prize team who promises to track them down within 24 hours to deliver a check for £10,000.

Olympic Waste of Resources - For What Exactly?

Ever wonder how much it costs to produce these Olympic Games?  Ever wonder how or why a world economy on its last leg can afford to find these games so important?

Do some research on the symbols littered throughout the ceremonies, and you might gather some idea...

Does anyone else find it criminal such amounts of money are spent when so much could be done to otherwise enhance the lives of so many living in sufferance?


Even the most fervent sports fan would agree that a central Olympic location and the removal of team colours/nationality, would be more appropriate, so as to bring forth the spirit of HUMAN endeavor, rather than corporate sponsored, publicly funded, national fervor/"pride" we see today.

Think of all the GOOD this amount of money COULD do for the world - well beyond a few hours worth of petty entertainment and pagan worship that most are too ignorant to even recognize....

Anti-Christ Legally Posting Adverts Now In The Subways

If you see the above nazi-like propraganda, dehumanizing the "enemy" of one of the most horrifically brutal genocidal terrorist groups of people - do what is right and urinate on it publicly....

EPA Reverses Itself on Fluoride

     For decades, fluoride has been marketed and heralded as essential for good dental hygiene and used in most toothpastes and mouthwashes. In addition, parents have been routinely encouraged to give their kids cavity-fighting fluoride treatments when they visit the dentist.
     Beginning in the late 1940s, aided by mass industry lead lobbying campaigns, the government encouraged municipal water authorities to add fluoride to their community’s drinking water.          According to the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), approximately 70 percent of the U.S. population ingests fluoride through their community drinking water today and they want this percentage to continue to climb. This is in stark contrast to other developed European nations were fluoride is rarely added to drinking water – Britain provides only about 10 percent of their population with fluoridated water.
     The “experts” and the government told us fluoride would strengthen tooth enamel, help prevent tooth decay and is, of course, perfectly safe.
     “Community water fluoridation is an equitable, cost-effective, and cost-saving method of delivering fluoride to most people,” noted Dr. William Maas, director of CDC’s Division of Oral Health.

     But that was then and this is now.
     In a surprising reversal, last month EPA’s announced that it intends to lower the maximum amount of fluoride in drinking water because of growing evidence supporting the chemical’s possible deleterious effects to children’s health.
     In 2006, the National Academy of Sciences report that found dental fluorosis – caused by too much fluoride – capable of putting children at risk of developing other dental problems including the breakdown of tooth enamel, discoloration and pitting.
     January’s EPA recommendation reversal was made following a revised risk assessment study that found 2 out of 5 adolescents had tooth streaking or spottiness and some pitting as a result of excessive fluoride. In addition, other studies have found excessive ingestion of fluoride capable of increasing the risk of brittle bones leading to fractures and debilitating bone abnormalities.
     There have always been fluoride critics who questioned the chemical’s safety and challenged the decision to use fluoride in municipal drinking water. According to the Los Angeles Times, back in 2005, “the heads of 11 EPA unions, including those representing the agency’s scientists, demanded that EPA reduce the permissible level of added fluoride in water to zero, citing research suggesting it can cause cancer. Other studies have pointed to neurotoxicity and hormone disruption from excessive fluoride”.

     It has taken the government more than 60 years to recognize – some would argue admit – that American children have been overexposed to this toxic, potentially harmful chemical.In response to the EPA’s sudden announcement, Jane Houlihan, senior vice-president of the Washington based non-profit Environmental Working Group, said, “this decision is another signal to the public to take care when it comes to exposures to industrial chemicals. What is considered safe today won’t necessarily be thought safe tomorrow.”
     Our government has a pretty abysmal track record when it comes acknowledging the potential health risks associated with certain chemicals, particularly when its agencies have already determined these products as “safe”, encouraged, and in some cases mandated their use. So it is somewhat encouraging to see the EPA acknowledging the need to revise their position on fluoride and should be commended for it.
     Nonetheless, here is yet another example of why consumers, especially parents, need to be vigilant, do their own research and understand that sometimes the “experts” and the government can be wrong.
NOTE: A reverse osmosis system is needed to remove fluoride from drinking water.

Read here how the CDC still insists on getting even more poison in your water (in their own words):
http://www.cdc.gov/media/pressrel/2008/r080710.htm

More on the battle:

latimesblogs.latimes.com/greenspace/2011/01/fluoride-drinking-water-regulations.html
 

In Plain View Now

I remember when this was just a "conspiracy theory."

Truth Eventually Infiltrates Even the MTV Youth

LUPE FIASCO
"Words I Never Said"
(feat. Skylar Grey)

[Skylar Grey]
It’s so loud Inside my head
With words that I should have said!
As I drown in my regrets
I can’t take back the words I never said
I can’t take back the words I never said

[Lupe Fiasco]
I really think the war on terror is a bunch of bullshit
Just a poor excuse for you to use up all your bullets
How much money does it take to really make a full clip
9/11 building 7 did they really pull it
Uhh, And a bunch of other cover ups
Your childs future was the first to go with budget cuts
If you think that hurts then, wait here comes the uppercut
The school was garbage in the first place, that's on the up and up
Keep you at the bottom but tease you with the uppercrust
You get it then they move it so you never keeping up enough
If you turn on TV all you see’s a bunch of “what the fucks”
Dude is dating so and so blabbering bout such and such
And that ain't Jersey Shore, homie that's the news
And these the same people that supposed to be telling us the truth
Limbaugh is a racist, Glenn Beck is a racist
Gaza strip was getting bombed, Obama didn’t say shit
That's why I ain't vote for him, next one either
I’ma part of the problem, my problem is I’m peaceful
And I believe in the people.

[Skylar Grey]
It’s so loud inside my head
With words that I should have said!
As I drown in my regrets
I can’t take back the words I never said
I can’t take back the words I never said

[Lupe Fiasco - Verse 2]
Now you can say it ain't our fault if we never heard it
But if we know better than we probably deserve it
Jihad is not a holy war, wheres that in the worship?
Murdering is not Islam!
And you are not observant
And you are not a muslim
Israel don’t take my side cause look how far you’ve pushed them
Walk with me into the ghetto, this where all the Kush went
Complain about the liquor store but what you drinking liquor for?
Complain about the gloom but when’d you pick a broom up?
Just listening to Pac ain't gone make it stop
A rebel in your thoughts, ain't gon make it halt
If you don’t become an actor you’ll never be a factor
Pills with million side effects
Take em when the pains felt
Wash them down with Diet soda!
Killin off your brain cells
Crooked banks around the World
Would gladly give a loan today
So if you ever miss a payment
They can take your home away!

[Skylar Grey]
It’s so loud inside my head
With words that I should have said!
As I drown in my regrets
I can’t take back the words I never said, never said
I can’t take back the words I never said

[Lupe Fiasco - Verse 3]
I think that all the silence is worse than all the violence
Fear is such a weak emotion that's why I despise it
We scared of almost everything, afraid to even tell the truth
So scared of what you think of me, I’m scared of even telling you
Sometimes I’m like the only person I feel safe to tell it to
I’m locked inside a cell in me, I know that there’s a jail in you
Consider this your bailing out, so take a breath, inhale a few
My screams is finally getting free, my thoughts is finally yelling through

[Skylar Grey]
It’s so loud Inside my head
With words that I should have said!
As I drown in my regrets
I can’t take back the words I never said

Are You an Addict?

David Gutierrez, staff writer for Natural News wrote a gripping piece on how Junk food-addicted rats chose to starve themselves rather than eat healthy food which puts scientific study behind what many of us already suspected - that junk food is essentially a highly addictive drug .

Here is a copy of the article verbatim:

(NaturalNews) A diet including unlimited amounts of junk food can cause rats to become so addicted to the unhealthy diet that they will starve themselves rather than go back to eating healthy food, researchers have discovered.

In a series of studies conducted over the course of three years and published in the journal Nature Neuroscience, Scripps Florida scientists Paul Johnson and Paul Kenny have shown that rats' response to unlimited junk food closely parallels well-known patterns of drug addiction -- even down to the changes in brain chemistry.

"What we have are these core features of addiction, and these animals are hitting each one of these features," Kenny said.

In their first study, the researchers fed rats on either a balanced diet or on the same diet plus unlimited access to junk foods purchased at a local supermarket, including processed meats and cakes. Within a short time period, the rats on the junk food diet began to eat compulsively and quickly became overweight.

"They're taking in twice the amount of calories as the control rats," Kenny said.

The researchers hypothesized that the rats were eating compulsively because, like drug addicts, they had become desensitized to smaller amounts and needed more and more for the same rush of pleasure.

Many recreational drugs work by directly stimulating the brain's pleasure centers, particularly the dopamine receptor known as D2. Overstimulation of this receptor causes the body to start producing less dopamine, leading the addict to compensate by taking more of the drug.

Since dopamine can also be released by pleasurable activities such as food or sex, Kenny and Johnson speculated that food addiction could develop in the same way. To test whether the rats had, in fact, become habituated to dopamine, the researchers took the rats from the first experiment and hooked their brains up to a device that would directly stimulate their D2 receptors when they ran on a wheel.

Rats eating a junk food diet ran on the wheel significantly longer than rats fed a normal diet, suggesting that their receptors had indeed become desensitized. This "profound" desensitization occurred after just five days on a junk food diet.

"They're not experiencing rewards the way they should," Kenny said. "When you experience that, one way of feeling better is to go back to the junk food."

"They lose control. This is the hallmark of addiction."

In another test of their addiction hypothesis, the researchers used a virus to block the D2 receptors in healthy rats. All those rats soon became compulsive eaters.

"This is the most complete evidence to date that suggests obesity and drug addiction have common neurobiological underpinnings," Johnson said.

Having established that the junk food rats had become addicted, Johnson and Kenny wanted to know how far this addiction would push them. So they took both junk-food addicted rats and rats that had not previously been exposed to such food, and exposed them to electrical shocks whenever they ate junk. Rats that had just been introduced to junk food quickly stopped eating it, while the addicted rats ignored the discomfort and kept eating.

Perhaps the most shocking finding came when the researchers took away the addicted rats' access to junk food and started feeding them only healthy rat chow again -- the same diets the rats had eaten as pups. When junk food was no longer available, the rats simply refused to eat for two weeks.

"They actually voluntarily starved themselves," Kenny said.

"It's almost as if you break these things, it's very, very hard to go back to the way things were before. Their dietary preferences are dramatically shifted."

The research strongly suggests that many modern humans also suffer from junk food addictions. Kenny notes, however, that unlike the rats, all humans with access to junk food do not become obese. He attributes this difference to the influence of health knowledge and social pressure in moderating people's natural eating habits.

"The rats don't suffer from the same social pressures that we do," he said.

The idea of junk food addiction is not a new one, and the dopamine-junk food connection was actually put forward by former FDA Commissioner David Kessler in his best-selling book, The End of Overeating.

"Certainly, we see this addictive pattern in humans," nutritionist Sandy Livingston said. "They know they shouldn't overeat, but they do it anyway."

Livingston expressed hope that better knowledge about the biochemical side of food addiction might result in lessened guilt and judgment surrounding obesity.

"A lot of people blame themselves -- 'Why don't I have any willpower?'" she said.

"Food can be highly addictive," said author and nutritional supplement producer Jordan Rubin. "When people describe overeating and weight loss as a battle, this is why."

He called for more research into which individual components of junk food, such as MSG, might be behind its addictive effects.

Obesity researcher Ralph DiLeone of Yale University noted that more research is needed into the long-term effects of such addiction, even if an animal later switches its diet and loses weight.

"They might be a normal weight, but how they respond to food in the future may be permanently altered," he said.

Suggesting yet another area for future research, Kenny has expressed hope that better biochemical understanding of food addiction might someday enable the development of a drug or vaccine as a treatment for compulsive eating.

Johnson and Kenny's research was funded by grants from the National Institutes of Health, Bank of America and The Margaret Q. Landenberger Research Foundation.

Sources for this story include:

http://www.palmbeachpost.com/health
http://www.sciencenews.org/view/generic/id/48605/titleJunk_food_turns_rats_into_addicts

Every Step You Take - Every Word You Say

A couple of very intriguing Op-Eds were published today regarding the Fourth Amendment and your privacy related to your cell phone.

Be sure to stay-tuned and watch closely how this all plays out. As the ACLU states, "This is the first time a federal appellate court has heard arguments on the legality of the data-collecting methods. It’s about protecting innocent people from unjustified violations of their privacy."

The government is arguing that based on precedents from the 1970s, any record held by a third party about us, no matter how invasively collected, is not protected by the Fourth Amendment.

Through The Tele-Screens

"Terrorism and Child Pornography Used to Justify Surveillance Society"


It's just as Orwell said:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/news/7054432/Terrorism-and-child-pornography-used-to-justify-surveillance-society-says-academic.html

Advocating Acceptance Through Naive Ignorance

A gorgeous piece of propaganda has been published over at Tech Crunch:
http://www.techcrunch.com/2010/01/12/ok-you-luddites-time-to-chill-on-facebook-over-privacy/
Seems the rationale of writer Michael Arrington (one of TIME Magazine's 2008 selection as the most influential people in the world) is, “We’re losing the battle to have privacy, so we may as well buy into facebook’s idea to exploit every facet of our lives.” It's also as if he is saying, "Let's label anyone who has an issue with this a "Luddite" and imply that they fear "progress.""

What exactly is progressive about subscribing to and feeding a gigantic marketing list like Facebook?

To me, this article comes just as expected. It's part of an impending slew of "journalism" offering the soft-sell to society. They're attempting to gain a growing acceptance of the loss of privacy.

In other words - It's GARBAGE PROPAGANDA! Leave comments on the original article and let them know you know! Link the story as such on Facebook to spread awareness. Let everyone know that the cronies of Facebook have the arrogance and audacity to come straight out and brag about your willing attitude to surrender your privacy.


*edit*
I also found this news posted in many places. The comment sections offer good insight from the average person.

Privacy May Be a Victim in Cyberdefense Plan