Courts Discreetly Confirm MMR Vaccine Causes Autism

Jonathan Benson, staff writer at Natural News just published an interesting article informing that the U.S. Vaccine Court discreetly confirmed (once again) that the measles, mumps and rubella vaccine (more commonly referred to as the  MMR Vaccine) does in fact cause autism.

Worcester Public Schools Mandate 9 Doses of MMR Vaccine before the age of 17!

Benson writes:  "You won't hear anything about it from the mainstream media, but the federal government's kangaroo "vaccine court" has once again conceded, albeit quietly, that the combination measles, mumps and rubella (MMR) vaccine does, indeed, cause autism. In a recently published ruling, part of which was censored from public view, a young boy was awarded hundreds of thousands of dollars after it was determined that the MMR vaccine led to a confirmed diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder (ASD).

Ten-year-old Ryan Mojabi's parents say he first suffered an encephalopathy after being vaccinated for MMR on December 19, 2003. Known as a "table injury," encephalopathy is a recognized, compensable adverse reaction to vaccines, and one that the kangaroo vaccine court has previously linked to vaccines. According to Ryan's parents, the MMR vaccine caused their son's encephalopathy, which manifested as "neuroimmunologically mediated dysfunctions in the form of asthma and ASD."

After being bumped around from court to court, Ryan's case was eventually heard by the vaccine court's Autism Omnibus Proceedings, according to The Huffington Post. And in the end, the federal government agreed that Ryan's encephalopathy had been caused by the MMR vaccine, a landmark ruling that confirms what Dr. Andrew Wakefield found more than 15 years ago when studying gut disorders in children given the MMR vaccine.

"Ryan suffered a Table injury under the Vaccine Act -- namely, an encephalitis within five to fifteen days following receipt (of MMR)," admitted the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) regarding the case. "This case is appropriate for compensation," it added, in full agreement with the court's decision.

Of particular note in the case is the fact that concession documents by the government remain under seal. While the court and the government at large openly admitted that the MMR vaccine caused Ryan's encephalitis, it did not make public its opinion on whether or not that encephalitis led to Ryan's other injuries, including those that fall into the category of ASD. But the fact that these documents remain censored shows that the government is hiding something of importance from the public, which most definitely has to do with the connection between the MMR vaccine and autism.

Concerned parents everywhere were right all along: MMR vaccine can cause autism
In a similar case heard during the same month, young Emily Moller from Houston, Texas, was also awarded massive compensation for injuries resulting from the MMR vaccine. According to reports, Emily experienced a severe reaction after receiving not only the MMR vaccine but also the DTaP (diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis), HiB, and Prevnar vaccines. Like with Ryan's case, the government conceded that these vaccines led to Emily's autism and other developmental problems.

These two cases, combined with numerous published studies out of the U.S., South America, and Europe, prove that the MMR vaccine is not the harmless vaccine that the conventional medical industry claims it is. In fact, everything that Dr. Wakefield found back in the late 1990s concerning the MMR vaccine -- findings that cost him his career and reputation, by the way -- are proving to be undeniably true.

"There can be very little doubt that vaccines can and do cause autism," Dr. Wakefield recently stated from his home in Austin, Texas. "In these children, the evidence for an adverse reaction involving brain injury following the MMR that progresses to an autism diagnosis is compelling. It's now a question of the body count. The parents' story was right all along. Governments must stop playing with words while children continue to be damaged. My hope is that recognition of the intestinal disease in these children will lead to the relief of their suffering. This is long, long overdue.""

Sources for this article include:

http://www.whiteoutpress.com

http://www.thelibertybeacon.com

http://www.huffingtonpost.coml

http://www.examiner.com

http://science.naturalnews.com

Psychiatry is Pseudoscience and It is Dangerous

Remember, when the government starts talking about mental "health" reform, they represent the interests of Big Pharma NOT the interests of the masses who are suffering from something much more profound - spiritual hunger. 


Making a Killing: The Untold Story of Psychotropic Drugging - Full Movie

The All Too Predictable Irony of The Shepard

     In the words of Zionist shill Rahm Emanuel, adviser to the White House, "Never let a good crisis go to waste." 

     We see this playing out quite nicely in sheep feeding houses like facebook in light of the CT shooting.  The powers have even employed the talents of Morgan Freeman (the benevolent grandfather character type) all over fakebook telling people they can help by "donating to mental health research."

      Following the continuous re-posting of this "well put" statement all over everyone's sheepfeed there was suddenly a large slew of people agreeing everywhere that this shooting at Sandy Hook is a result of "mental health care inadequacy" and the answer lies somewhere in  mandatory psych screenings and evaluations for students throughout their years in school.

     Is it that difficult to connect the dots to see how this will inevitably lead to mass drugging of our youth?  Remember, if a school system or mental "health" professional advises you that your child needs medication, say for depression or ADD and you refuse to drug them, it is protocol that you are reported to Child Services for neglect which could ultimately lead to the loss of your parental rights.  Not only is this effort a very slippery slope, but it is the pinnacle of irony considering that one known common element behind all the recent mass shootings are psychotropic medications.

     The Physicians’ Desk Reference lists the following common adverse reactions (side effects) to SSRI (the meds used by the mental "health" industry to treat depression, anxiety, and other mental health conditions) as:

    •    Manic Reaction (Mania)
    •    Hypomania (e.g., poor judgment, over spending, impulsivity, etc.)
    •    Abnormal Thinking
    •    Hallucinations
    •    Personality Disorder
    •    Amnesia
    •    Agitation
    •    Psychosis
    •    Abnormal Dreams
    •    Emotional Lability
    •    Alcohol Abuse and/or Craving
    •    Hostility
    •    Paranoid Reactions
    •    Confusion
    •    Delusions
    •    Sleep Disorders
    •    Akathisia (Severe Inner Restlessness)
    •    Withdrawal Syndrome
    •    Impulsivity


NOTE:  None of these adverse reactions is listed as Rare!
 
      Adverse reactions are most likely to occur when starting or discontinuing the drug, increasing or lowering the dose or when switching from one SSRI to another. Adverse reactions are often diagnosed as bipolar disorder when the symptoms may be entirely iatrogenic (treatment induced). Withdrawal, especially abrupt withdrawal, from any of these medications can cause severe neuropsychiatric and physical symptoms. It is important to withdraw extremely slowly from these drugs, often over a period of a year or more, under the supervision of a qualified and experienced specialist, if available. Withdrawal is sometimes more severe than the original symptoms or problems.

     So while many are ready to "donate to mental health research" as the actor who played God said, and while others emotionally consent to mandatory mental health screenings in schools - please do your part to remind them that Big Pharma has an undeclared slice of responsibility for this mess to begin with so helping them to cement a competitive advantage in their fastest growing segment (CHILDREN)  will not help solve the issue of emotionally numb children committing violence, in fact it will certainly make matters far worse on many levels.

     We need to collectively think DEEPER about the issues that are behind the growing mental instability in our world, particularly amongst younger generations.  Where is it coming from really?  Gun control was much looser in the past and we didn't have these types of occurrences so frequently or at such a heinous level.  What has changed?  Let's look deeper into our drug-oriented, violent, desensitized, materialistically Godless culture.  If we do, only then can we recognize that there is no political solution for a spiritual problem...

The Effect of Color in Our Food

(*A Direct re-post)
Colorless Food? We Blanch
By GARDINER HARRIS
Published: April 2, 2011
The New York Times

WASHINGTON — Without the artificial coloring FD&C Yellow No. 6, Cheetos Crunchy Cheese Flavored Snacks would look like the shriveled larvae of a large insect. Not surprisingly, in taste tests, people derived little pleasure from eating them.

Their fingers did not turn orange. And their brains did not register much cheese flavor, even though the Cheetos tasted just as they did with food coloring.

“People ranked the taste as bland and said that they weren’t much fun to eat,” said Brian Wansink, a professor at Cornell University and director of the university’s Food and Brand Lab.

Naked Cheetos would not seem to have much commercial future. Nor might some brands of pickles. The pickling process turns them an unappetizing gray. Dye is responsible for their robust green. Gummi worms without artificial coloring would look, like, well, muddily translucent worms. Jell-O would emerge out of the refrigerator a watery tan.

No doubt the world would be a considerably duller place without artificial food coloring. But might it also be a safer place? The Center for Science in the Public Interest, an advocacy group, asked the government last week to ban artificial coloring because the dyes that are used in some foods might worsen hyperactivity in some children.

“These dyes have no purpose whatsoever other than to sell junk food,” Marion Nestle, a professor of nutrition, food studies and public health at New York University.

A government advisory panel concluded that there was no proof that dyes caused problems in most children, and that whatever problems they might cause in some children did not warrant a ban or a warning label beyond what is already required — a disclosure on the product label that artificial colors are present.

“Color is such a crucial part of the eating experience that banning dyes would take much of the pleasure out of life,” said Kantha Shelke, a food chemist and spokeswoman for the Institute of Food Technologists. “Would we really want to ban everything when only a small percentage of us are sensitive?” Indeed, color often defines flavor in taste tests. When tasteless yellow coloring is added to vanilla pudding, consumers say it tastes like banana or lemon pudding. And when mango or lemon flavoring is added to white pudding, most consumers say that it tastes like vanilla pudding. Color creates a psychological expectation for a certain flavor that is often impossible to dislodge, Dr. Shelke said.

“Color can actually override the other parts of the eating experience,” she said in an interview.

Even so, some food companies have expanded their processed-product offerings to include foods without artificial colorings. You can now buy Kool-Aid Invisible, for instance, and Kraft Macaroni and Cheese Organic White Cheddar. Some grocery chains, including Whole Foods Market and Trader Joe’s, refuse to sell foods with artificial coloring.

As yet, natural colorings have not proven to be a good alternative. They are generally not as bright, cheap or stable as artificial colorings, which can remain vibrant for years. Natural colorings often fade within days.

Todd Miller, the executive pastry chef for Hello Cupcake in Washington, said he was dedicated to simple, natural ingredients. His cakes are made with flour and butter, and his red icing gets its color from strawberry purée.

But the sprinkles that top many of his creations have colorings derived from good old petroleum, the source of artificial colorings. And he has no intention of changing that because the natural stuff just isn’t as colorful.

“I could live without sprinkles, but why would I want to?” he asked. “They’re cupcakes. They’re supposed to be fun.”

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/04/03/weekinreview/03harris.html?ref=gardinerharris
A version of this article appeared in print on April 3, 2011, on page WK3 of the New York edition.

Exploiting the Third World - The Filled With Malevolent Traits Foundation

As a person deeply concerned with the state of the world ethics in marketing (or rather the lack therein) is a subject I am constantly fascinated by.

Ethics and Corporate Social Responsibility speaks on voluntary actions taken by a company to address ethical, social, and environmental impacts of its operations and the concerns of its stakeholders. There are many dynamics and differences of companies that are ethical vs. unethical, socially responsible vs. socially irresponsible, and any combination therein.

Well, what of the companies that are neither ethical or socially responsible that hide and grow creatively behind the façade of both ethical and socially responsible institutions? These are undoubtedly the most morally reprehensible types of unethical businesses on the globe, calling to mind Dante's 9th circle dwellers of his epic poem, "The Inferno."

One such institution is the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. On its carefully polished exterior, the foundation presents itself as a philanthropic non-profit whose mission statement reads, " Dedicated to bringing innovations in health, development, and learning to the global community." It sounds lovely and looking over the firm's PR it makes Mr. Gates and his wife out to look like angels walking the Earth to protect children of the third world from disease.

Bill Gates is everywhere on mainstream media promoting the importance of vaccination spewing false and hyperbolic statistics in order to snowball support for his ambitious initiatives to vaccinate the third world and cure it of AIDS and other diseases. The Foundation makes very substantial funding to NPR radio who does its fair share of promoting agendas on-board with the Gates foundation, through thinly veiled "news segments." (Nothing new for NPR, which does the same for other horrific institutions like Monsanto - another proud sponsor of its news program.)

Not much is mentioned on these radio spots, or in the mainstream media in general questioning Mr. Gates' motives for operating an organization whose mission is to eradicate the third world of disease. Gates is obviously a brilliant business man and an entrepreneur who is many steps ahead in the business world, so why would he be concerned with the health of the third world? This question is asked particularly amongst those who are aware of Gates outspoken position on the importance of curbing the world's population through vaccination and reproductive interferences such as planned parenthood.

Well considering the hundreds of millions of money already spent with hundreds of PR-stunts featuring Bill Gates as a modern Santa Clause he has not made a single effort promoting natural, non-patentable therapies. Moreover, Gates and the other "stuntmen" were caught financing international conferences, like in Toronto, and abused it to attack South Africa and other governments who decided to cut themselves loose from the genocidal business with antiretroviral (ARV) drugs promoted by big pharma. [L]

Also once need only consider that The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation has purchased shares in nine big pharmaceutical companies valued at nearly $205 million -- an investment likely to attract attention more for its symbolism than its size. The foundation, the nation's largest with an endowment of $24.2 billion from Microsoft Corp. Chairman Bill Gates and his wife, already is a major force in international health issues, contributing $555 million in 2000 alone to global health programs. The organization has emerged as a prominent voice in the debate over how to supply cheaper drugs for AIDS and other diseases to poor countries. At times, it has assumed the role of a broker between poor nations and drug companies. [L2]

The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation is investing lots of time, energy, and consideration into each innovation project, which tend to indicate that each effort has significant promise. We should remember that such promise is not only encouraging for the downtrodden, but for capitalist as well.

I feel it is the responsibility of the media, as well as those who are reading between the lines to pick up the ethical slack here and share vital information behind this institutions and others like it, that put on the mask of a savior and exploit the problems of the oppressed nations to reap giant profits and seize vital control of resources abroad.

U.S. Justice System Bows To Big Pharma - Puts Drug Company Profits Over Children's Health

The Associated Press published a piece today titled: Court Rules Against Parents in Drug Vaccines Case by Mark Sherman. Here is a direct re-post:

WASHINGTON – The Supreme Court ruled Tuesday that a federal law bars lawsuits against drug makers over serious side effects from childhood vaccines.

By a 6-2 vote, the court ruled against the parents of a child who sued the drug maker Wyeth in Pennsylvania state court for the health problems they say their daughter, now 19, suffered from a vaccine she received in infancy.

Justice Antonin Scalia, writing for the court, said Congress set up a special vaccine court to handle such claims as a way to provide compensation to injured children without driving drug manufacturers from the vaccine market. The idea, he said, was to create a no-fault system that spares the drug companies the costs of defending against parents' lawsuits.

Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Sonia Sotomayor dissented. Nothing in the 1986 law "remotely suggests that Congress intended such a result," Sotomayor wrote, taking issue with Scalia.

Scalia's opinion was a stinging defeat for parents who found their award from the vaccine court insufficient or failed to collect at all.

Such was the case for Robalee and Russell Bruesewitz of Pittsburgh, who filed their lawsuit after the vaccine court rejected their claims for compensation. According to the lawsuit, their daughter, Hannah, was a healthy infant until she received the diphtheria, tetanus and pertussis vaccine in April 1992. The vaccine was made by Wyeth, now owned by Pfizer, Inc.

Within hours of getting the DPT shot, the third in a series of five, the baby suffered a series of debilitating seizures. Hannah continues to suffer from residual seizure disorder, the suit says.

Scalia said that when a vaccine is properly prepared and is accompanied by proper directions and warnings, lawsuits over its side effects are not allowed under the 1986 law.

"Vaccine manufacturers fund from their sales an informal, efficient compensation program for vaccine injuries," Scalia said. "In exchange they avoid costly tort litigation and the occasional disproportionate jury verdict."

The American Academy of Pediatrics, representing more than 60,000 doctors, praised the decision. "Childhood vaccines are among the greatest medical breakthroughs of the last century," said Dr. Marion Burton, the group's president. "Today's Supreme Court decision protects children by strengthening our national immunization system and ensuring that vaccines will continue to prevent the spread of infectious diseases in this country."

The vaccine court has paid out more than $1.9 billion to more than 2,500 people who claimed a connection between a vaccine and serious health problems.

The drug companies worried that they would face a flood of lawsuits over the side effects of vaccines in the event of an unfavorable Supreme Court decision. They were especially concerned about claims from families of autistic children who say the vaccines, or mercury-based thimerosal that once was used to preserve them, are linked to autism. Numerous studies have addressed vaccines and autism and found no link, including with the preservative.

Pfizer applauded the decision. "We have great sympathy for the Bruesewitzes," Pfizer Executive Vice President and General Counsel Amy Schulman said, "We recognize, however, that the Vaccine Act provides for full consideration of the liability issues through the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program. Here the Vaccine Court concluded that the petitioners failed to prove their child's condition was caused by vaccination."

David Frederick, who represented the Bruesewitz family at the Supreme Court, said, "I'm disappointed for the families of victims of defectively designed vaccines, who now have no remedy at law for their injuries."

Justice Elena Kagan took no part in the case because she worked on it while serving in the Justice Department.

The case is Bruesewitz v. Wyeth, 09-152.

Ficticious Epidemics

Fluoride Could be Contributing to Early Puberty, Studies Show

Read the article. Get the book.

Strangers With CANDI

Hey kids, you want some candi? Step into my van...


The audaciously named Child and Adolescent Neuro-Development Initiative (CANDI) has been spotted perusing the neighborhoods in search of young minds to play with. Keep your children indoors where they are safe from any eugenics initiatives that were born of 2004's New Freedom Commission on Mental Health.

You remember that commission right? It pushes psychotropic drugs to the kiddies through mandatory "mental health" screenings set-up in schools.

Sound good?

Well consider that we have no clue as per the long-term side effects that these drugs have on children whose brains are still developing. Some adverse side-effects are already evident, yet parents have been threatened with child-abuse charges if they refuse to drug their kids. And seeing as how diagnoses of most of these childhood "disorders" are extremely subjective, you have to wonder if kids will be singled out simply for having philosophical or political views that are unfashionable.

One thing we do know for sure, medical science has yet to even identify every possible brain chemical yet it seems okay for these pharmaceutical companies and their psycho-goons to experiment with altering the minds of developing children.

Teach your children the important safety measure of never taking candi from strangers.

Dumbing the Youth

In a world where so much hoopla goes into banning beer and cigarette advertisements (and rightly so) it's ironic that we are bombarded CONSTANTLY with pharmaceutical ads all day long.

For quite a while now upon signing out of hotmail, when redirected to the MSN homepage, a very disturbing pop-up ad for Intuniv is flashed in my face. Intuniv is a creation of Shire, a company hell-bent on drugging the youth of America and beyond.

As one reader put it, Shire's philosophy on children is straight and to the point: "Drug them up real good while they're young, and they'll be nice and quiet. Because your time at home should peaceful, even after making that big step into parenthood. "

The Intuniv website is littered with info about how the drug is great for making mindless drones. Take these examples for instance:

• " INTUNIV can slow thinking and motor skills."

• "Brandon is still an average 10-year-old boy, but when confronted with problems, he is learning to accept our input and to redirect himself without an argument. Our family feels like a family!"

• "Symptoms of ADHD may include being easily distracted,... arguing with adults,..."

• "Behaviors such as temper outbursts and arguing with adults are associated with ADHD."

Serious possible side effects of INTUNIV include low blood pressure, low heart rate, fainting, sleepiness, tiredness, and drowsiness. The most common side effects of INTUNIV in clinical studies included sleepiness, drowsiness, low blood pressure, headache, nausea, stomach pain, dry mouth, dizziness, irritability, constipation, and decreased appetite.

The presentation of these ads are just as bad if not worse than your average beer or cigarette commercial. The particular pop-up ad that influenced this blog entry portrayed a young boy as a monster for having "symptoms" that every normal young person should have! The ad send the message that your life as a parent can be much easier if you drug your child into a sleepy, lackadaisical mind-state.

These constant bombardments of advertisements urging us to drug the soul out of our kids are an indicator of where we are headed as a society of junkies.

Get on board and take a stand against this kind of brainwashing and petition against this brand of pseudoscience brought to you by the pharmaceutical company marketing departments that create diseases and treatments on a daily basis. Do it for the mental health of society as a whole.


Links:
http://democracyinaction.org/dia/organizations/commercialalert/campaign.jsp?campaign_KEY=1415&t=stop_drug_ads_home.dwt

http://www.commercialalert.org/issues/health/drug-marketing